How should we understand the covid era? It has been the opening salvo of a global coup through which small-minded despots are attempting to control all life by means of petty by-laws. “Where’s your mask?” “Stand here, not there!” “Use the disinfectant before entering the store.” “Only the vaccinated need apply.” “Playground closed until further notice.” “Long-term care home closed to the families of residents.”
Do you feel belittled, diminished, humiliated, less than human? Good, then it’s working.
We are now passing into the next phase of total surveillance and micromanagement of our lives: CBDCs, digital health certificates, WHO global health codes, digital identities, transhumanism, 5G and 6G installations, digital surveillance, and so on. This global coup is being installed through statutes, legislation, and treaties.
We are witnessing an undeclared war against humanity, against the People. There will be no backing down. So, you need to choose a side and fight like everything depends on the outcome. Because it does. Winner gets the planet.
Ultimately, there is only one way out. True democracy.
True democracy is guaranteed by the constitution. What is a constitution? It is a statement of the rules of governance. A constitution simply outlines how a People is governed. In a democracy, the People govern themselves. But how?
The rules of governance for Canada were formalized in 1215 in the Magna Carta. Within the document, the relationship between the government (King John, at the time) and the People were put forth in a number of clauses. These were the rules of governance. And they are very clear. The government can make statutes or laws. But then only the People can decide whether or not to accept those laws. The People govern the government. The People pass judgement on the government. The mechanism by which that is assured is Trial by Jury.
Juries must be randomly selected, so as to be truly representative of the People. They must judge the facts of the case and the law. If they determine the law, under which the accused has been charged, to be unjust, they have the duty to annul that piece of legislation. They also have the duty to convict an offender of a just law. This is clearly articulated in the Magna Carta, the rules of governance for England and its offspring.
In Canada, the head of state is the monarch of Great Britain. In a couple of months, King Charles III will take the coronation oath. He cannot take an oath except the one that King John bequeathed. King Charles III is the sovereign. The People of Canada are sovereign. By simple identity, King Charles III is the People of Canada.
King Charles III = People of Canada.
History has bestowed on King Charles III the duty to ensure that no Parliament be allowed to govern the People against our will. We judge Parliament. Parliament cannot judge us. There are several mechanisms that King Charles III has at his disposal to be one with the Canadian People. First, he can refuse to give royal assent to unjust laws. More importantly, his duty is to assure that the cornerstone of our constitution, Trial by Jury, be respected.
If the government is allowed to make the laws and then enforce them, you are living in a despotism. And so we are. Our government mandated masks and then enforced the mandate. Our government mandated vaccines and then enforced the mandate. Our government passed the Emergencies Act and then enforced it. And so on.
The government cannot judge itself. The People, in a democracy, must judge the government and its legislation.
We must recover our heritage while we can still imagine it. It is not beyond our imaginations. But we have been increasingly alienated from it for centuries. What that means is that, in the eight hundred years since the Magna Carta, individuals and interests that wanted more, or absolute, power have tried to obscure from the People their actual, constitutional power.
To better understand where we are misleading ourselves as to our natural and constitutional power over the governments, consider a few recent examples.
In a speech describing the continuing catastrophic results of the mRNA vaccines, Doctor Daniel Nagasse told a Vancouver audience that the political fault lay with the oath of office of Canadian politicians across all levels of government. The prime minister, for example, swore an oath to Queen Elizabeth II. Nagasse implied that this was a vow to an individual person and, as such, Trudeau was beholden to nobody but a fabulously rich old lady living in her castles across the ocean. But no, that’s not it. To pledge an oath to the monarch is to subject yourself to the People of Canada. By pledging an oath to the queen, Trudeau was vowing to serve the People of Canada and to submit himself to their judgement, through the monarch.
Queen Elizabeth II = the People of Canada
According to our common-law tradition, articulated eight-hundred years ago in the Magna Carta, the monarch cedes power to the People through the mechanism of Trial by Jury. Parliament can pass legislation. But that legislation first requires royal assent. The monarch retains the royal prerogative to reject acts of Parliament that interfere with the freedoms of the People. Secondly, the People themselves, through Trial by Jury, have the same option to validate or annul the legislation. So, both the monarch and the People have the same power. Monarch = People.
In 1688, the English Parliament, through the Coronation Oath Act, attempted to write itself into the constitution as the supreme authority. They required William and Mary to swear to betray the law of the land, the common law that had been articulated in the Magna Carta. Of course, the attempt was obviously unlawful. No parliament can change the rules of governance. And, any parliament that attempts to do so is thereby discredited.
So, what did they require of William and Mary? What was the price they put on the British throne? The coronation oath included the following phrase, asked of the royals: “Will You solemnly Promise and Sweare to Governe the People of this Kingdome of England and the Dominions thereto belonging according to the Statutes in Parlyament Agreed on and the Laws and Customs of the same?” To which William and Mary were to reply: “I solemnly promise soe to doe.”
The intention was to make the monarch subservient to Parliament. Just like that, Parliament wiped out the Sovereign whose main purpose since long before 1215, but agreed upon in the Magna Carta, was to defend the sovereignty of the People.
Let’s now look at the coronation oath sworn by Queen Elizabeth II in 1953.
“I solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and my Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs.”
You will notice that Queen Elizabeth did not swear to govern according to the statues passed by Parliament as would have been required by the Coronation Oath Act of 1688. Instead, her oath was in alignment with the Magna Carta. (Of course, she failed miserably throughout her reign to adhere to her duties as laid out in the Magna Carta. In her defence, only a monarch with overwhelming support from the People could hope to recover our ancient liberties. So, it’s time to brush up on your claim to freedom.)
The monarch is sovereign. The People are sovereign. Sovereign in relation to what? Answer: Parliament. The Queen and the People judge Parliament. Only then do we live in a democracy. And no outside authority can override the sovereignty of the People. They do not even enter into the equation: Monarch = People. In that equation, there is no room for the WHO. Nor the WEF. Nor the UN. Nor the BIS.
This means that politicians cannot invite the WHO or WEF into Canada through the back door of Parliament to take control of the sovereign People.
Nice try, Justin.