This is a post about the meaning and pervasiveness of digital-government ministries and agencies everywhere in Canada. Provincial, federal, public-private partnerships, etc. It’s only an introduction. I’ll post other analyses of this development in the coming days. But I had to stop somewhere for the moment …
***
Your understanding of what’s going on in the world is a function of whether or not you believe in a virus called SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. If you accept the existence of that virus, then you are drawn into debates about how best to manage its impact on humanity: from lockdowns, social-distancing, masks, vaccines, and ventilators to prophylactic treatments, vitamins, and sunshine. There are two approaches within the virus people: a hard versus a soft approach. WHO, Fauci, Gates, and politicians represent a hard approach while America’s Frontline Doctors, Didier Raoult, Vladimir Zelenko, Mercola and friends, as well as the Barrington Declaration advocate for a soft response.
However, if you reject the claim that the virus exists, then you look elsewhere to inform yourself about what’s taking place in the world and why. Early on, Stephan Lanka proved that this virus has never been found in nature and that the claim that it exists is actually anti-scientific. This scientific critique of SARS-CoV-2 in particular, and virology in general, has been most eloquently argued by Andrew Kaufmann, Tom Cowan, Mark and Sam Bailey.
Operation Covid is not a response to a medical emergency. Most of the world is engaged in a debate over how best to manage the virus: the soft versus the hard approach. But the research agenda is radically different for those of us who have been persuaded that the virus doesn’t exist outside of a computer simulacrum. Those soft and hard proponents of the Virus Theory who claim that SARS-CoV-2 is man-made would still have to demonstrate its role as the agent of an infectious disease. That hasn’t been done. It’s too late to bother now, since the entire covid architecture has been built on a lie.
Right from the start, people like Alison McDowell were positioned to smell the rat. The architecture for the global transformation to AI, the Great Reset to the Fourth Industrial Revolution had been in development for decades and was being rolled out under the pretext of controlling a virus. When you see just how deep and wide that architecture actually is, you can no longer take the Germ Theory people seriously.
The purpose of the covid vaccines is to prepare its victims to be integrated into the Internet of Everything. The vaccines are introducing graphene-based materials that are self-assembling inside human bodies into an infrastructure that can send digital signals to the cloud, tracking all possible information: biological functions, emotional states, thoughts, as well as geographical positioning. More and more evidence is revealing the self-assemblage of the vaccine materials and the phenomenon of vaccine victims registering MAC (media access control) addresses. Government and media shills have reached hysterical levels in their goal of forcing the vaccine on the informed and moral elements of societies. These directives are emanating from a control centre that is perfectly clear that COVID-19 is make-believe.
To be clear: we are not facing a situation in which some pharmaceutical giants are holding governments hostage for profits. This is not about money. If, for instance, Pfizer was pressuring Canada to mandate the vaccine in order to increase profits, well, then, I would prefer to just give them the money they want if they agreed to go away. That would be gunboat diplomacy. In response, we could just pay the thugs to leave us alone. No, this is not about a disease or about profits. Something far more ambitious is at play. And we’ll be exploring here a little history that will help us understand the bigger picture. In the end, the pharmaceutical giants are simply the tools of DARPA and the intelligence agencies, which are, in turn, being used by the globalists to lead us all into the Fourth Industrial Revolution and transhumanism. “It doesn’t change what you do, it changes who you are,” Klaus Schwab told us years ago. We are facing an existential threat to humanity, something that didn’t concern Mr. Schwab, perhaps because he knew that not all humans would be transformed/vaccinated. He would have already had his globalist exemption.
If, indeed, we are witnessing the transformation of human life, then we should be able to track the groundwork that has been laid to that end. We can. And we will.
In this post, we’ll make a start towards understanding digital government. In Canada, it has been under construction for years. On the surface, digital government has been sold to Canadians as a convenience, a way to make our lives easier, a strategy to save public money while offering government services. Convenient. Efficient. Safe and effective (where have I heard that before?). Harmless.
But what happens when we scratch the surface of digital government?
***
In 2017, the government of Canada created the Ministry of Digital Government. That year, ten countries came together to participate in a new global forum called Digital Nations “to provide a focused forum to share best practices, identify how to improve the Participants’ digital services, collaborate on common projects and to support and champion our growing economies.”
The ten countries are Israel, Denmark, Estonia, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Korea, Mexico, Portugal, and Uruguay. They signed a charter on 3 November 2020 in Ottawa at the conclusion of their annual meeting. They agreed to be guided by a number of vague principles as they advance the goal of digital government. For instance, to strive “to ensure that the design and delivery of public services through the use of data, digital and other technologies, takes a human-centred approach, and promotes the global public good.” I don’t know what that means. They are also committed to ensuring “that the design, development and deployment of digital technologies, especially the use of data and artificial intelligence is subject to adequate and necessary safeguards to uphold public trust.” They are to promote the “interoperability of digital technologies” that are “shareable between” the different digital nations. They are also to become members of the Open Government Partnership. Why all this global sharing? Why globalization of our digital data?
I wrote above that I don’t know what the Digital Nations meant by their feel-goody rhetoric about promoting the public good. But I fear that, in reality, I do know.
They also committed themselves to ensuring “the opportunities and benefits offered by digital tools, technologies and services are available to all by taking inclusive approaches to tackle digital divides, including through efforts to improve connectivity, promote access to digital infrastructure, and support high quality web and other accessibility standards.” So, they will ensure that every citizen of their countries is connected to the Web. Why? What about those of us who are escaping what we can clearly see is the overreach of government surveillance? We’re going off-grid because we want to live with nature, not as transhumans.
I now get cold sweats when I read that Digital Nations have committed themselves to “Strive to support children, young people and adults in developing digital competencies and skills, and also promote innovative learning environments for public servants.” A few years ago, that would have put me to sleep. It’s bureaucratic bullshit. Then again, it’s not. They were telling us that they are preparing the ground to “support” children to enter the digital world, to offer their digital twins to the metaverse. If you read through Alison McDowell, you will know how nefarious that “goal” is.
Finally, the Digital Nations were created to “Promote a culture of innovation and experimentation where new ideas and experiences take place, including through a multi-stakeholder approach inclusive of industry, academia and civil society’s engagement and participation.” No wonder no one ever knows what the government is up to. Reading government policy-position papers is like being subjected to Vogon poetry. I think what this means is that the government of Canada is laying the foundation for big tech, academia, and favoured interest groups to manage the biological and social data that can be squeezed out of Canadian citizens (who, as we have been told previously, must all contribute) to feed the coming AI world system. Are you starting to understand what’s happening? Do you still think that there is a virus that requires us to be injected with graphene structures capable of reading our biometrics?
What we’re going to discover is that all federal and provincial ministries have created digital-government agencies and platforms. Why? They are all paid to roll out the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It’s embedded in their Vogon poetry. Watch for the keywords used by all Vogons: stakeholder, inclusivity, sustainable, equitable, interoperable, blockchain, public-private partnerships. They don’t mean what you may think.
Here is one civil servant speaking in 2018 about the progress of digital government. She is in charge of interoperability among government agencies. She frames her work, as they all do, in terms of how different agencies need to communicate with ease in order to respond to emergencies. Sounds good. But then why are we making sure that our data are consistent with global standards? Could it be that this allows for a global control of information? Of data collection and analytics? (I’m assuming you’ve listened to her now.) She says that Canada is working with Google and other big-tech players to make the digitalization process global. Google works with the American Department of Defense and NSA to develop the infrastructure for the coming AI revolution (Fourth Industrial Revolution, if you like). You should be able to see that her job is to make a reality the harvesting of as much data as possible from Canadians available to feed AI. Listen to her around the 13 minute mark to see what’s behind this. She has a slide with their partners – big banks, big tech, etc. This is, she’s happy to say, a project of public-private partnership. Which means that government makes life easy for transnational business that supports government in turn. It could be called fascism. But government is always created by the powerful to further their interests. What does she think will allow us to enter the new world, which I suppose Canadians are supposed to accept without question?
Listen to her language “…allowing one message to move quickly and automatically distributed is what’s going to move us into the Digital Age.” She argues that the standards for digital data are the same as standards for sending letters. The standards allow people in different countries to know where the letter’s going. (Write the address here, put the stamp there, for example.) This is the justification for global standards of data. She never mentions the possibility of a global AI databank. These standards are simply a common language that help systems communicate with each other and send data where it needs to go. (So, people in Lithuania and North Korea need to know where I was born and how much money I made last year and what by biometrics register and whether I dream of a better life.) She says it’s about “building trust with citizens.” I don’t trust her.
I’ll continue this trend in the coming days, commenting on other digital-government agencies that I think are flying under the radar and that are actually ushering in the world few of us understand is coming.