Canada entered into an agreement with Pfizer to supply the country with vaccines to protect Canadians against infection from the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19. Never mind that the virus has never been demonstrated to exist and is a purely theoretical, computer-generated construct; that COVID-19 is a set of symptoms so broad that it is difficult to avoid a diagnosis if you aren’t feeling well; that the purported vaccine is patented as gene therapy; that the vaccine trials were fraught with corruption on the part of Pfizer and the FDA; that Pfizer’s vaccine contains graphene oxide, a biosensor able to send and receive signals from the human body to the 5G network; that the military and intelligence complex has been developing the biotechnology necessary to achieve this goal of transforming humans into biodigital things that can be surveilled and controlled; that Canada has been openly committed to the implementation of biodigital convergence for years. The COVID-19 vaccine is precisely the roll out of biodigital convergence! Meanwhile brainwashed Canadians have lined up to be fitted with their biosensors. Now, they’re sending their children to be initiated into this Brave New World that has such people in’t.
Let’s continue to review some of these issues. Let’s theorize about who are running this conspiracy. The media cartel is keeping the key facts from us. Before reading this post, familiarize yourself with Canada’s commitment to biodigital convergence. Policy Horizons is a government agency, directed by a graduate of Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum, that harmonizes Canada with the global move to biodigital convergence. Also, Canada’s Ministry of Digital Government has been moving Canada in this direction for several years. Canada has been a member of the Digital Nations since the inception of the organization.
In this post, we are going to be looking at Pfizer, with whom the Canadian government entered into a contract for vaccines. First, we’ll see that Pfizer is a serial felon that has paid billions of dollars to settle charges that it routinely bribes politicians, public health officials, and doctors. Please think carefully about the history recounted here when a vaccine proponent tells you that they are just following the advice of our politicians, public health officials, and doctors. Consider Pfizer’s business model. However, don’t stop there, because it seems likely that the pharmaceutical companies are acting as the tools of the military-intelligence complex and profiting in the process. Crime pays. Especially when law enforcement masterminds the crime.
***
In 2009, Pfizer agreed to pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of several of its pharmaceutical products. It pled guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for misbranding the anti-inlammatory drug Bextra with the intent to defraud or mislead. Pfizer promoted the sale of Bextra for uses and dosages that the FDA had specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. Pfizer also submitted false claims to government health-care programs in relation to four drugs. Part of the settlement resolved claims that Pfizer had also bribed health-care providers to get them to prescribe various drugs.
That same year, Pfizer settled a case in a Nigerian court for seventy-five million dollars for the victims of its experimental anti-meningitis drug, Trovan. The parents of the children disabled by the drug had not been told that the drug was experimental. This had been a violation of the Nuremberg Convention. Pfizer paid an additional undisclosed amount in the United States to settle charges there.
No one at Pfizer faced justice for these crimes. In relation to the Bextra case, the American Department of Justice reported that, “As part of the settlement, Pfizer agreed to enter into an expansive corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services. That agreement provides for procedures and reviews to be put in place to avoid and promptly detect conduct similar to that which gave rise to this matter.” The deal was similar to Canada’s deferred prosecution agreement, which allowed SNC-Lavalin to avoid criminal charges for fraud and corruption (including bribing foreign officials) in return for agreeing to be a better corporate citizen. However, in both cases, it was not the companies that had acted criminally, but their executives who profited by doing so. In fact, the companies were simply the vehicles for executives to advance their careers and to profit personally. In the case of SNC-Lavalin, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau unethically attempted to pressure Attorney-General Jody Wilson-Raybold to implement the deferred prosecution agreement rather than prosecute the company on the charges laid by the RCMP. The debate was speciously framed by the media cartel: it wasn’t SNC-Lavalin that should have been prosecuted, as they implied, but its executives. When executives who act criminally are not prosecuted, they, and their homologues in all sectors of the economy, have no incentive to act morally.
So, did Pfizer learn how to act ethically as a result of the corporate integrity agreement? In 2012, the New York headquarters of Pfizer agreed to pay over sixty million dollars to settle documented charges of bribery. Pfizer Italy employees had been providing doctors with cell phones, televisions, office equipment, vacations, and direct cash payments in exchange for prescribing Pfizer products. The penalty was half a percent of Pfizer’s 2011 annual profits. Also in 2012, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer agreed to pay fifteen million dollars to resolve an investigation of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for bribes made to government officials and healthcare professionals in Bulgaria, Croatia, Kazakhstan, and Russia. According to court documents, Pfizer bribed hospital administrators, members of regulatory and purchasing committees, as well as other health professionals and sought to influence government decisions regarding the approval and registration of Pfizer products. Pfizer admitted that, between 1997 and 2006, it had paid more than two million dollars in bribes to government officials in Bulgaria, Croatia, Kazakhstan, and Russia. Pfizer admitted that it made more than seven million dollars in profits as a result of the bribes.
In the 1990s, Pfizer agreed to pay over ten million dollars to settle Department of Justice charges that it misled regulators about the safety of a heart valve that caused the death of over one hundred people. It paid sixty million dollars to settle a lawsuit over the diabetes medication Rezulin that caused patients to die from acute liver failure. Pfizer was fined ninety million euros in the United Kingdom for overcharging the National Health Service forty-six million euros per year. In 2004, it agreed to pay $430 million to settle criminal charges that it had bribed doctors to prescribe Neurotonin, an epilepsy drug, for indications for which it had not been approved. In 2011, a jury found that Pfizer had committed racketeering fraud in its marketing of Neurotonin. It paid $142.1 million to settle the charges. In the course of the trial, Pfizer disclosed that it had paid nearly 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals twenty million dollars to speak on its behalf.
Pfizer is currently fighting hundreds of lawsuits over Zantac, a heartburn medication, that claimants say may be contaminated with a cancer-causing substance known as N-nitrosodimethylamine.
Back in 2016, President-elect Trump asked Bobby Kennedy, jr, to head a comprehensive investigation into the safety of vaccines. Trump had invited Kennedy to Trump Tower for a meeting, during the course of which Kennedy explained the potential value of a well-known database called the Vaccine Safety Datalink that would give researchers a vast amount of medical records from which a picture of vaccine safety and danger could be constructed. The Vaccine Safety Datalink was (and is) kept practically closed to independent researchers by Anthony Fauci. However, after Pfizer contributed a million dollars to Trump’s Inauguration, the president-elect not only closed down Kennedy’s investigation before it got started, but appointed Scott Gottlieb, a pharmaceutical executive, as head of the FDA. Now, he sits on the board of Pfizer.
Consider the nature of Pfizer’s recurring crimes: fraud, bribery of medical doctors, public health officials, and politicians, lying to regulators, and using humans as experimental subjects without their knowledge, a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Anyone who trusts the government, media, or their doctors in relation to the COVID-19 injection should have their head read.
***
The government of Justin Trudeau, a politician whose ethical standards have been put to the test on numerous occasions and come off second best, signed a contract with Pfizer that grants the serial felon total indemnity from prosecution no matter what happens. In all of the cases listed above, Pfizer was forced to produce documentation during discovery at trial. That’s how we know that Pfizer is a serial felon. In this case, however, there will never be a court case in Canada. If half of Canadians die from the “vaccine,” Pfizer must be paid in full and Canada, by the terms of the agreement, will be forced to defend the criminal company against all charges.
Who in their right mind would take this shot? Twice! No one, obviously. The answers lie elsewhere and the clue is in the phrase “in their right mind.” Some combination of the following may explain this bizarre situation: Canadian society is suffering from widespread delusional psychosis; Canadians are, in the majority, morally and intellectually handicapped; Canadians are easy to blackmail and bribe; Canadians are obedient to the point of sacrificing their own health and the health of their children to unaccountable, evil, and corrupt forces. It is the last one that keeps me up at night. When I see parents offering their children to a state that would enter into a devil’s contract with Pfizer, a convicted felon, then I wonder if there will be any way out of Covidland. I am reaching out to whatever sane humans are left in the world.
But let’s stay focused on the Pfizer contract for this post.
***
We are indebted to Ehden Biber who has used his skills in the field of information security to obtain and disseminate the contracts that Pfizer has signed with countries all over the world. Biber has uncovered the contracts from Brazil and Albania and they are almost identical. So, as he argues, it is likely that Pfizer would have used the same template for all countries, including Canada. I suspect that Pfizer would not have signed this contract with the United States, since the Secretary of Health and Human Services granted Pfizer immunity from prosecution under the PREP Act in March 2020. Secondly, I suspect that Pfizer is working in this case as a front for the American military and intelligence services. Countries would have been pressured from Washington to accept these contracts. Leaders of countries that rejected the covid narrative were heart-attacked. Moreover, I suspect that the American Department of Defense, in conjunction with the intelligence services, is really behind the development of the “vaccine.”
Against what does Canada need a vaccine? For over a year, Christine Massey has been submitting Freedom of Information requests to institutions across Canada asking for records that describe the isolation of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus from an unadulterated sample extracted from a diseased patient. Massey did not limit her request to the institution, but invited them to forward evidence of any such isolation and purification of the virus from anywhere in the world. The protocols that would be required, (that are well within the competence of most laboratories), are described by Sally Fallon Morrel and Doctors Cowan and Kaufman. As of 6 August 2021, twenty-eight had responded. None could offer her any such evidence of the existence of the alleged virus. The agencies and institutions contacted include Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, National Research Council of Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health, police departments, and universities. None were aware of any such research having led to the isolation of a virus anywhere in the world.
So, why did the Canadian government need to negotiate a contract with Pfizer for millions of doses of a vaccine? What was the content of that contract? It hasn’t been easy to find out.
Even members of Canada’s parliamentary health committee were kept in the dark about the contracts that Canada signed with the vaccine manufacturers. In October of 2020, they asked to see the contracts, but were denied. On 19 February 2021, they passed a formal motion to see the contracts. In June of 2021, they were finally granted access to very heavily redacted versions of the contracts. Members of the European Parliament had exactly the same response when they asked to see the contracts.
Now that the contracts with Albania and Brazil have been leaked and disseminated throughout the world, it would be in Canada’s interests to make its contract public to show that the same terms did not apply … unless Canada did sign the same contract. However, if Canada did sign essentially the same contract, it could not release it to the public, since the contract binds Canada to confidentiality. So, the fact that Canada has not released its contract with Pfizer suggests that it is indeed the same as that imposed on Albania and Brazil.
Section 2.1 (c) states that “the Parties recognize that the Product has completed Phase 2b/3 clinical trials and that, despite the efforts of Pfizer in research, and development and manufacturing, the Product may not be successful due to technical, clinical, regulatory, manufacturing, shipping, storage, or other challenges or failures.”
So, Canada agrees to accept that the vaccine may not be successful at something that is stipulated in Section 1.54. There, it says that the vaccines, “are intended for the prevention of the human disease COVID-19 or any other human disease, in each case which is caused by any of the virus SARS-CoV-2, and/or any or all related strains, mutations, modifications or derivatives of the foregoing, (b) any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine, or (c) any component or constituent material of (a) or (b).” Since SARS-CoV-2 is an artefact of the PCR test, and not an actual virus circulating in the population, it can never be proved to be either present or absent. Canada has signed a multi-billion dollar contract to eradicate unicorns, and all of their progeny, from its territory. Anyway, the contract says that the vaccines are “intended” to prevent this magic disease; it doesn’t say that it will. And, we know from the trials that the vaccines were never tested against preventing COVID-19, but merely against reducing mild symptoms of that alleged disease.
It is difficult to understand how Pfizer, a convicted serial felon, could have successfully negotiated a clause that indemnifies it against all possible liability. But it did, in Section 8.1:
“Purchaser [Canada] hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their respective Affiliates may directly or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research, development, manufacture, distribution, commercialization or use of the Vaccine, and each of the officers, directors, employees and other agents and representatives, and the respective predecessors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing (“Indemnitees”), from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation), whether sounding in contract, tort, intellectual property, or any other theory, and whether legal, statutory, equitable or otherwise (collectively, “Losses”) arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine, including but not limited to any stage of design, development, investigation, formulation, testing, clinical testing, manufacture, labeling, packaging, transport, storage, distribution, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, licensing, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, provision, or use of the Vaccine.”
By the terms of this clause, Pfizer will not have to go to the trouble of negotiating some kind of better corporate citizen agreement over this product when the shit hits the fan. Canada, and not Pfizer, is on the hook. Who’s the criminal?
As the terms of this agreement are made public, there is outrage that it overrides national sovereignty and subjects populations to Pfizer. In the Netherlands, a new opposition party is asking questions of the government. As Canada heads towards a federal election, Canadians need to elect independent members of parliament, not aligned to any party, to ask fundamental questions. It looks like the only possibility – albeit a mammoth task – to take government away from the parties and tame the civil service.